pto

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Soundboard Signatures #9361
    pto
    Participant

      my 1991 TR signed by Jeff Traugott and that cowboy luthier, Otis B. Rodeo:)

      pto
      Participant

        for some reason, when i edited out the 3 trypos i found, they didn’t take.  apologies, i was trying to be careful for the reader’s sake:)

        pto
        Participant

          i’m with Alex (and always have been every time this question rears its head)… i wouldn’t bet my life on the numbers.  too many inconsitencies in the explantions over the years, even on the UNwound strings, as Alex has pointed out in the past.  it’s like asking John Pearse where their strings are made – maybe a picture of the factory – something fishy about their reluctance to defend their claims.  JOh Pearse: Maybe a factory tour like D’add gives?:)  i do like the SCGC mid-tensions a lot, since the overall tension is lower than other makers’ “mediums.”  they work well for how lightly SCGC is made.  (Frank Ford called the Tony Pro a hot rod.:)

          as i suspected, the whole “parabolic” nomenclature is just a name they gave it.  RH most recently said in the podcast “it looked like a parabola” to us, when he was asked my question.  they talk about “the science” over and over.  but “looked like parabola” (presumably because it was “curved”) is hardly a scientific or mathematical explanation.  curved also is a catenary, hyperbola, circle.  it’s just marketing, as far as i can figure – like EQ.  (the whole EQ thing has never been explained other than to use the EQ word over and over.  it’s only frustrating to me because being a mathematician and engineer i’m curious.  words mean things.  “back in 2015 i thought “oh, parabolic tension, how did you do that, what axactly is parabolic?  that’s neat.  but then, dead end.:) i always thought they could have avoided all MY (its all about me, after all, as you can tell by now:)) confusion by giving the strings a name like optimized tension or custom-tuned, or something.  BOTTOM LINE, though, i LOVE the strings.  i only use them on mey Santa Cruzes though. D’Add is my go to on other maker’s instruments.

          in reply to: Forum Update, NEW Info #9304
          pto
          Participant

            thanks for your tireless work on our behalf!

            in reply to: UPdate on the Forum #9300
            pto
            Participant

              as much as i sympathize – times are TOUGH in this business, i disagree on the curent marketing program (of that which i’m aware) compared to what SCGC did historically. i think it’s sterile as i said in the earlier post, another thread. the site used to be unique, compared to every other great builder. it gave us the inside look at what they are currently doing.  the history and relationships… worth it’s weight in gold!  regarding photography, they already had access to the setup, etc…  now if it’s a staffing question, then that is clearly SCGC’s business and decision. and i certainly defer there.:)

              i say all of this only in comparison to the old website which was so informative, up-to-date always.  Now, if the facebook page could give those updates, that would be great.  Richard is fabulous – first as a human being and humanitarian; and then as a luthier, manager, mentor, teacher, friend – it goes on and on.  but how many times can you say “what’s our secret?” on facebook.  Let’s see the beautiful, unique work as much as possible.

              in reply to: Three new 50th Anniversary models? #9286
              pto
              Participant

                respectfully – precious little info from SCGC over the last year – AND leading up to and including NAMM.  the new website is – to me and for my needs – so sterile in comparison to all the years before.  Just another website.  Brenda told me last year that the “just shipped” feature, for example – which was so helpful, informative and exciting – was not happening because of staffing.  i know there are changes afoot – and huge amounts of time need to be dovoted to OUR 🙂 company, but it used to be such a personal experience.  of course, i’m famous for living in the past, but those memories of past relationships and events and accomplishments!:). about all i can find these days is discussions of the vague “EQ” (which i really dont’ understand); and of “what’s our secret.”  Again, respectfully, i hope.

                • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by pto.
                in reply to: Who signed my guitar and why? #9241
                pto
                Participant

                  here’s a clearer example of Mr. McCoy’s signature.

                  in reply to: Who signed my guitar and why? #9240
                  pto
                  Participant

                    Finally an answer to the original (Tony Miller’s) post.  That’s Forrest McCoy!  Adam Rose protege…  Thanks for the research, Brenda…:). much appreciated.

                    in reply to: Who signed my guitar and why? #9237
                    pto
                    Participant

                      Henrik was after Ken Davis and Before Liam Jones and Joseph King.

                      in reply to: Who signed my guitar and why? #9236
                      pto
                      Participant

                        for jsbry-  that voicer was Henrik Bridger.  i had a d45 built with Dexter Johnson’s primo primo primo Brazilian, march 2002 was the signature date.

                        in reply to: Richard and Eric Schoenberg talk OMs #9221
                        pto
                        Participant

                          coupla giants.  great to see.  and RH not in selling mode.:)  really sweet.  thanks!

                          in reply to: Who signed my guitar and why? #9215
                          pto
                          Participant

                            1st August 2, 2024 video is Adam Rose… both  face and the signature.  don’t think i saw that one before. slow it doewn to 1/4 speed.:)

                            in reply to: How long? #9191
                            pto
                            Participant

                              long lines at the DMV? come to Wyoming. on second thought…:)

                              in reply to: How long? #9186
                              pto
                              Participant

                                in general, i use the phone.  email responses can be sporadic.  phone always works.

                                in reply to: Missing the new build pictures #9171
                                pto
                                Participant

                                  I asked Brenda a similar question after Namm. Paraphrasing as best i can, staff is stretched a little thin… Makes sense to me.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 74 total)